<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why A Link To Your Website Can Be Worth Nothing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sksservices.co.uk/blog/why-a-link-to-your-website-can-be-worth-nothing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sksservices.co.uk/blog/why-a-link-to-your-website-can-be-worth-nothing/</link>
	<description>Improve your websites Serps and Rankings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 05:55:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Stratagem</title>
		<link>http://www.sksservices.co.uk/blog/why-a-link-to-your-website-can-be-worth-nothing/comment-page-1/#comment-1057</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Stratagem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 07:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sksservices.co.uk/blog/?p=113#comment-1057</guid>
		<description>Backlinks are popular enough to be mentioned twice. Ensure that the backlinks come from a variety of popular domains that are relevant to your website. Try to get links from all different types of websites (news, blogs, old, new, borrowed and blue (?). OK, maybe forget about the “blue”, but I’m sure you get the idea. If all your backlinks come from one small subsection of the Internet, Google might think that you’re very relevant to that subsection. Or, they might think you’ve using some devious and underhanded technique to get backlinks. All I can say here is “be careful”.  
If you&#039;re looking for a good introduction to SEO guideline that an economical SEO firm can follow, check this one out. http://www.bergstrom-seo.com/resources/google-search-engine-optimization-starter-guide.pdf. It was written by google, and it&#039;s really good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Backlinks are popular enough to be mentioned twice. Ensure that the backlinks come from a variety of popular domains that are relevant to your website. Try to get links from all different types of websites (news, blogs, old, new, borrowed and blue (?). OK, maybe forget about the “blue”, but I’m sure you get the idea. If all your backlinks come from one small subsection of the Internet, Google might think that you’re very relevant to that subsection. Or, they might think you’ve using some devious and underhanded technique to get backlinks. All I can say here is “be careful”.<br />
If you&#8217;re looking for a good introduction to SEO guideline that an economical SEO firm can follow, check this one out. <a href="http://www.bergstrom-seo.com/resources/google-search-engine-optimization-starter-guide.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.bergstrom-seo.com/resources/google-search-engine-optimization-starter-guide.pdf</a>. It was written by google, and it&#8217;s really good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why A Link To Your Website Can Be Worth Nothing &#124; SEO Services</title>
		<link>http://www.sksservices.co.uk/blog/why-a-link-to-your-website-can-be-worth-nothing/comment-page-1/#comment-1049</link>
		<dc:creator>Why A Link To Your Website Can Be Worth Nothing &#124; SEO Services</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 09:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sksservices.co.uk/blog/?p=113#comment-1049</guid>
		<description>[...] As a website owner just looking for improved rankings, just getting a bunch of backlinks is good right? Just pay someone $20 to create a hundred directory submissions perhaps? Wrong. There are a couple of things you need to know about backlinks and the effectivness of them. Firstly the quality of the link.&#160;Read More&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As a website owner just looking for improved rankings, just getting a bunch of backlinks is good right? Just pay someone $20 to create a hundred directory submissions perhaps? Wrong. There are a couple of things you need to know about backlinks and the effectivness of them. Firstly the quality of the link.&nbsp;Read More&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

